Looming Budget Cuts Threaten Community Colleges

Warren Garrison, 68, stifles a curse in front of his Intermediate Algebra class as a piece of chalk snaps apart in his hand. “Well, that’s all the chalk for this quarter,” he said with shake of his head. After class, he said, “Running out of supplies is the least of our problems. I still regret how many students I had to turn away this quarter.”

The picture is bleak at community colleges across the state, as the college system faces funding shortages coupled with increased enrollment and fewer resources for those students lucky enough to receive an add code. According to the San Francisco Chronicle’s January report on the approved budget, over five billion dollars will be cut from the state’s education fund in 2009 and 2010.

1. $9.2 billion budget solution 2. $4.5 billion cut from California's school system 3. $322 million cut from California's community colleges 4. $4 million cut from De Anza College. Image from La Voz Weekly.

De Anza College has one of the best transfer rates to UC’s and CSU’s in the state, yet even this is no longer a possibility for everyone. The UC and CSU systems are also curtailing admissions due to budget cuts, leaving prospective transfers with nowhere to go.

Sheila Saddieh, 22, graduated from the Fashion Institute of Design and Merchandising in 2007 before returning to De Anza in 2008, hoping to transfer to San Jose State University and study journalism. Yet she received a bad shock this summer after completing her CSU application.
“I hit ‘Submit’ and it told me my application wasn’t accepted,” Saddieh said. “Then when I called the admissions office to find out if there was some mistake, they told me they had already closed off applications. I was so upset.”

“This is my third year at De Anza,” said Ryan Driggs, 20, in an interview at a local coffee house. “I should be transferring, but the CSU’s say they aren’t letting in any more and I don’t want to go out of state,” he said.

On a positive note, the budget cuts have had the unexpected effect of bringing students from far-flung corners of the state to De Anza. Sharlyn Castro, 22, moved to San Jose from Santa Barbara, Calif., this year to attend De Anza’s nursing program. “Now [due to budgetary issues] the program [at SBCC] is day-only, and I have to work.”

Castro chose De Anza because many of the prerequisites for the nursing program are also offered in the evening. “I’m really glad I moved. I live with my cousin so it’s okay money-wise. I just can’t believe it took all this to go back to school,” said Castro.

Of ten students and instructors interviewed, only Peter Lin, 19, seemed unconcerned. Lin, a biology student with aspirations to medical school, said, “It doesn’t make a difference to me. I got all my classes and it’s not like I pay for them anyway.” [Lin later said his parents pay his fees and expenses in full.]

For the majority of community college students, however, that easy optimism is hard to find, although none were as grim as Driggs. At the end of the interview he said, perhaps only half-jokingly, “I guess I’ll just take classes here until the economy improves or I die. Whichever comes first.”

Further Information

The 2009-2010 Budget

California Legislative Analyst’s Office 2009-2010 Budget Report

California Community Colleges Official Website: Further Cuts In Mid-Year Reduction Plan

San Jose Mercury News: Community Colleges Feel The Squeeze

San Jose Mercury News: Community College Enrollment Hits All-Time High
CSU Long Beach Daily 49er: Not All Bad News; Some CSUs Making Admission Exceptions

New America Media: How Will CA Community College Access Be Impacted By The Budget Costs?

Get Involved

Schedule of further meetings of De Anza College’s general assembly and Student Senate can be found here
No Cuts To Education – a community organizing resource.
La Voz Weekly: De Anza students mobilize against budget cuts

Renovations To Come!

So my linkfest is in serious need of an upgrade. Contrary to what my sidebars imply, my daily blog intake consists of more than middle-class white feminists who have issues handling diversity.

And also, why aren’t I plugging the Socialist Worker more? It’s one of the only newspapers I actually read anymore!

Trampled Reproductive Rights Are Not An Acceptable “Middle Ground.”

Rep. Tim Ryan (D-Ohio) was booted from the Democrats for Life board for insisting on contraception access as a way to reduce abortions. The key quote from Rep. Ryan:

I can’t figure out for the life of me how to stop pregnancies without contraception. Don’t be mad at me for wanting to solve the problem.

Congrats, Rep. Ryan! You’ve stumbled upon the reason why many “pro-life” groups are actually far more extreme than a majority of the public: they’re against birth control. Restrictions on contraception access only result in unjust, unnecessary restrictions on sexuality and the sexual behavior of women. And of course more unwanted pregnancies, and therefore more abortions, legal or no.

Maybe that’s the whole point, y’think?

Just as a fun side-note, the follow-up artice in the “Vindy” (here ) does not include this quote, but spends a good deal of time talking about what a meanie Tim Ryan is for referring to the group as “fringe.”

Except how can they be anything but a fringe group when they’re institutionally opposed to something that a vast majority of Americans will use, in one form or another, in their lifetime? Think about that. A political group with mainstream access and visibility is opposed to contraception, and the rest of us are just supposed to think it’s only a friendly difference of opinion.

So tell me, President Obama, where is this “middle ground” you were talking about?

I’m tired of waking up in Bizarro World.

Dear Naomi Wolf:

Please shut up. By framing Angelina Jolie (immensely rich, well-connected, conventionally beautiful Angelina Jolie, no less) as the ultimate feminist icon because she “gets away with” sticking it to patriarchal society, you’re only making yourself look stupid. Or narrow-minded and self-interested. I think I’m gonna go with the latter.

Love, Veronica.

It’s pieces like this that earn American mainstream feminism its bad name. And please note, I said “earn.” Y’all have earned it. It took a lot of effort to turn a movement that has been co-opted by white upper-class interests over and over again SINCE ITS INCEPTION into a movement where the SAME OLD SHIT is NEW and SEXYFUN and EMPOWERFULIZING!

In other words, it’s no surprise that American mainstream feminisms constitute a “Yay, capitalism!” club; it’s just the ladies’ auxiliary of the All-American “Yay, Capitalism!” club, also known as, oh, I don’t know, OUR ENTIRE PUBLIC DISCOURSE.

But for those of us who still think feminism means something, well, this is just embarrassing. So let me make it clear.

Angelina Jolie has made all of her money by pandering to the male gaze as “the crazy hot chick.” This image has been carefully cultivated vis-a-vis vials of blood and Billy Bob Thornton. When your sex appeal is synonymous with your market value, there is nothing “liberating” or “revolutionary” happening.

Or, I can just link to My Ecdysis, because Sudy says everything better than I do. She is one of the few anti-capitalist feminist/womanist writers out there, and her voice is rare in America. And because I spat coffee onto my keyboard at the phrase “puked up colonialism,” which is the funniest thing I’ve read all day.

Proclaim the Pill Day

Some “pro-life” groups have  declared June 6th to be “Protest the Pill Day.” You can read all about it here, the website of ThePillKills.

Yes, we all know that there are side effects.  Birth control prescriptions come with several pages of fact sheets and warning labels. I read them. I’m alive. Every drug has potential side effects and every drug can potentially kill someone. This is not news.

I want to know why these people aren’t out protesting freeways. After all, thousands of people die unnecessarily in car accidents. Most of those trips aren’t necessary. The people who die in car accidents were just being selfish. See where this is going?

Oh, maybe it’s actually about sex? Who’da thunk? This is from the website’s “Talking Points” section:

Q: What are other alternatives to the pill?
A: If you are married and for some serious reason you need to hold off on having a child, there are safe, natural ways to doing this. Couples who learn Natural Family Planning as it is taught by the Couple to Couple League and/or the Pope Paul VI Institute, which teaches the Creighton Model, have a much higher success rate in spacing their children. Marriages have a much higher success rate and women feel better about themselves, are healthier and as a result, happier. The obvious reason for this is that a woman is not ingesting chemicals that her body does not need, but rather she is learning along with her spouse how her body works and how her cycles can help plan their family. Another great resource is One More Soul at (800) 307-7685 or www.omsoul.com. They publish a list of alternatives to the pill that women have found to be very helpful.

That’s it.

Hey, did you know that people who aren’t married have sex too? And the world is still spinning? The fact that the above scenario is the only one this group is willing to imagine makes their intent clear: they don’t want women having sex that doesn’t result in legitimate children for some dude.

Well, fuck all that noise.

I am not married. I have sex.

I take birth control. I’m not dead.

Going on birth control is one of the best things I’ve ever done for myself. I have my entire life ahead of me to plan when I want to have a family, and to make sure that any future children are wanted and provided for.

Telling me not to have sex because I’m not married is just not going to fly. That’s a moral standard that I in no way agree with, and I’m sure as hell not going to hold myself to it because a bunch of desert-bound misogynists put it in a 2000-year-old book of fairy tales that everyone seems to care so much about these days.

The irony of all this is amazing, because the number-One reason why I take birth control is because I don’t want to have an abortion! Imagine that!

So, fuck you, Protest the Pill.

I will proclaim my pills. I am not ashamed.

In Which A Good Joke Is Lost, To The Detriment Of Guerrilla Feminism.

Talking with my parents last night reminded me of this, one of many intentionally and unintentionally hilarious human interactions slung at me while slinging lattes to yuppies in Willow Glen.

There’s a subspecies of women in Willow Glen, most certainly overlapping with other coffeehouse patron populations. The sunvisor that belies the unnaturally tanned face, the khaki shorts with wedge sandals. The desperation to look “casual” at odds with the desperation to flaunt class status markers; the intersection of which created, and continues to fuel, the marketing success of such oxymoronic concepts as the “diamond tennis bracelet.”

These customers include a few Starbucks refugees who curiously insist on referring to their monstrous aspartamed beverage of choice as a “skinny” nonfat sugarfree whatever. I object to the anthropomorphization of beverages in general, but it especially sticks in my craw when the term in question is riddled with all kinds of gendered sexyfun baggage. As proof of this, I offer up my concrete purely anecdotal evidence that NO dude has EVER requested of me a skinny (or anthropomorphized, for that matter) espresso drink.

Part of my grand unified theory of sexist bullshit is the suggestion (by no means an original one) that the entire coffee culture in America is still regarded in certain overly-influential cultural circles as a limp-wristed pursuit, hence all the mindless right-wing yammering about “latte liberals,” but that’s a digression for another day.

Back to this woman: “Can you make me a skinny vanilla latte?”

“No, I’m sorry, our drinks don’t have body issues.”

This rare flash of wit was met with a blank stare and the soft swish of a joke becoming airborne over somebody’s head. Of course, I smiled and backtracked and made her the drink anyway, and she even used a diamond-crusted hand to tip me a whole fifty cents.

I was disappointed though, not because she didn’t think I was funny, but because oftentimes a small barbed joke is the best way to get people to consider the underlying implications of seemingly innocuous stuff like this. Guerrilla tactics don’t always take.

Though I’ve got no illusions about how high the soapbox is behind a coffeehouse counter. I’ll be the first to admit that the exposure of breast tissue increased my gratuity take. This is precisely why a dude had to seriously creep me out or chap my hide before I’d open up with the “Hey Clyde, my tits aren’t gonna be making your coffee, I am, so eyes up here!”

Common Ground

This is the moderate American’s goal in navigating “the abortion debate.” And it is usually wrong.

In popular practice, the “common ground” most often agreed upon is the universal “tragic” nature of abortion. Many, many better writers than I have already pointed out the high ground lost in even acceeding to this framework. And I agree. As someone who gives the medical practice of aborting a pregnancy the same moral weight as my annual Pap smear, I understand that not everyone feels the same way. We will never find common ground on the “morality” issue if someone I am attempting to coexist with in a civil society equates a personal (MY person, keep in mind) medical practice with murder.

It’s the wrong common ground to seek as a civil society. I’m also someone who morally equates the raising of children in sexist fundamentalist households with abuse. But civilly, I will fight tooth-and-nail the “pro-lifer’s” right to believe what they believe and raise their kids to believe it too.

But not to intimidate. Not to threaten. Not to legislate morality in such obvious woman-hating channels. And certainly not to murder doctors in churches.

You don’t see me protesting churches or threatening priests. Because I and many others are already at the common ground: we fully support the right to find a medical practice morally abhorrent as well as morally neutral. I fully support the conservative woman’s right to shun both birth control and abortion, just as I support the civil right of a dude to raise his son to be a sexist asshole. I, however, expect my rights to be upheld as well.

That’s the only common ground that matters in any society with any fucking pretense to democratic ideals.

Just checking in.

Even though it’s been months since I’ve posted, for which one can thank my fantastic thesis on medieval popular protest, I’m just going to throw out a bunch  general, unqualified statements that I’ve been thinking about.

-Our economy is fucked. It was fucked anyway, and it still is, despite all that talk of hope and change and shit. We’ve got an administration that is treating what’s going on as some kind of anomalous disruption as opposed to a structural flaw. In a country where we now borrow as much as we earn, investment banks are building their own goddamn air hangars while unemployment soars, and yet for some reason we have a government which still treats Wall Street like rational, successful players in this game while insisting that the solution to the crisis is just to get everyone spending again on borrowed money. I call bullshit.

But don’t listen to me. Paul Krugman’s got a degree in this stuff.

-On a similar note, y’all have NO IDEA how excited I am to be graduating into literally one of the Worst Job Markets Ever. At least my degree has taught me quite a bit about how to wield a pitchfork.

-I recently sat in a room full of underclass-students and listened to them discuss “feminism.” Apparently, “feminism” is not a multi-faceted political, intellectual, and academic movement, but rather some nebulous beast that produces odd cultural effects by its very existence as a defined term. The reactions to feminism ranged from

“feminism to me means that it’s okay! to wear skirts and makeup and stuff, because It’s My Choice!”

to

“I’ve got a beef with feminism because it ends up restricting women’s choices by denying their essential nature as mothers…and it leaves no room for traditional romance.”

Yes, we’ve got the girl for whom the trappings of femininity are totally empowerfulizing, and the guy who doesn’t see the irony in stating that a school of thought which rejects the very idea of any group having an “essential nature” is the one limiting the choices of women by refusing to shove them all into the same box.

And I, in the neon eyeliner which I’m well aware is a concession to femininity like many others we all make, is the one who stands says that “embracing of femininity” shouldn’t be on that chalkboard as a trait of feminism because “femininity” only refers to a series of practices and behaviors designed to mark us out as an oppressed sex class and NO radical feminism does not say that we’re going to take away your heels and your pretty dresses the POINT of the radical position is to say that if men and women ever REALLY interact from a position of true human equality you could wear whatever the FUCK you wanted because nothing you put on would be interpreted as the REQUIRED markers of FEMININITY, also known as the public display of your availability as a member of the sex class. Yes, even the eyeliner. But do you really think anyone is still going to “choose” to wear any of this crap after the revolution?

That didn’t go over very well, but it needed to be said.

-The more I think about it, marriage needs to go. I hope to make a good example of myself and bag the thing entirely.

Enjoy your day.

A College Public Service Announcement…

To: Honky Fraternity Members

CC: every resident of Isla Vista, CA

Dearest well-meaning colleagues,

We regret to inform you that, despite popular perception, your ardent belief that it should be legal for you to sit around on your privileged ass and smoke weed all day does NOT in fact make you one of the oppressed spirits to which Bob Marley so frequently referred. So start talking about real social justice or take that goddamn poster off the wall already.

Love,

People Who Actually Care About Things

The Cannibalist Manifesto

One semester in the making, my translation of Oswald de Andrade’s 1928 modernist classic, “The Cannibalist Manifesto.” A call to arms for cultural anthropofagites everywhere. Significant grammatical liberties have been taken because Andrade’s abruptness does not translate well out of the compact Portugese verb structures into English’s more expansive ones. Ending notes (not proper ones, because I don’t have the stupid WordPress footnote plug-in, so if you don’t get a reference check the bottom or Wikipedia) with cultural references are also mine.

The Cannibalist Manifesto

Only cannibalism unites us. Socially. Economically. Philosophically.

It’s the singular law of the world. The sentiment masked in all individualisms, in all collectivisms. In all the religions.  In all the peace treaties.

Tupi*, or not tupi that is the question.

Against all catechisms. And against the mother of the Gracchae.

I am only interested in that which is not mine.  Law of man. Law of cannibalism.

We are tired of all the suspicious Catholic husbands caught up in drama. Freud solved the Enigma of Woman and other scares of print psychology.

What destroyed the truth was the clothing, the impermeable barrier between the interior world and the exterior world. The reaction against the well-dressed man. American cinema will inform.

Children of the sun, mother of the living. They met and loved ferociously, with all the hypocrisy of nostalgia, as immigrants, as traffickers, as tourists. In the country of the great serpent.

It was because we never had grammars, or collections of old-world plants. And we never knew what was urban, suburban, backland and continental. Lazy men on the world-map of Brazil.

A participatory conscience, a religious rhythm.

Against all the importers of canned consciousness. The tangible existence of life. And the pre-logic mentality for Mr. Levy-Bruhl to study.

We want a Caribbean revolution. Better than the French revolution. A unification of all successful revolts for the rights of man. Without us, Europe would barely have had their paltry declaration of human rights.

The golden age trumpeted by America. The golden age. And all the girls.

Descendants. The contact with Caribbean Brazil. Ori Villegaignon print terre. Montaigne. The Natural Man. Rosseau. From the French revolution to Romanticism, to the Bolshevik revolution to the Surrealist revolution and the barbarous technics of Keyserling. We’re moving right along.

We were never baptized. We live under the right to sleepwalk. We made Christ appear in Bahía. Or in Belém do Pará.

But we never allowed the birth of logic among us.

Against Padre Vieira. The author of our first loan, to gain his commission. The illiterate king told him: sign here on the form, but without sweet talk. The loan was made. Brazilian sugar was ground. Vieira left his sugar money in Portugal and brought us the sweet talk.

The spirit refuses to conceive of the spirit without the body. Anthropomorphism. The cannibalism vaccine is necessary. For a counter-balance against the religions from within. And the inquisitions from without.

We can only answer to the orecular world.

We’ve had vengeance codified as justice. Science codified as Magic. Cannibalism. The permanent transformation of Taboo in totem.

Against the reversible world and objectivized ideas. Cadaverized. The stop of thought which is dynamic. The individual victim of the system. Source of the classic injustices. Of the romantic injustices. And the forgetting of the interior conquests.

Routes. Routes. Routes. Routes. Routes. Routes. Routes

The Caribbean instinct.

Death and life of hypotheses. From the equation I am part of Cosmos to the axiom Cosmos are part of I. Subsistence. Recognition. Cannibalism.

Against the elite vegetables. In communication with the soil.

We were never baptized. We made Carnival. The indian dressed as the senator of the Empire. Pretending to be Pitt. Or appearing in Alencar’s* operas filled with good Portuguese sentiments.

We already had communism. We already had the surrealist language. The golden age.

Catiti Catiti
Imara Notia
Notia Imara
Ipeju.*

Magic and life. We had the relation and distribution of physical goods, of moral goods, of dignified goods. And we knew how to transpose mystery and death with the help of some grammatical forms.

I asked a man what a Right was. He told me that it was the guarantee of possibility. That man was named Galli Mathias*. I ate him.

There is only no determinism where there is mystery. But what have we got to do with this?

Against the histories of man that begin at Cape Finisterre. The undated world. Unsigned. Without Napoleon. Without Caesar.

The fixation of progress through catalogs and television sets. Only the machinery. And the blood transfusions.

Against the antagonistic sublimations. Brought in caravels.

Against the truth of the missionaries, defined by the sagacity of one cannibal, the Viscount Cairu. It was a lie told many times.

But those who came were not crusaders. They were fugitives from a civilization that we are eating, because we are strong and vindictive, like Jabuti.

If God is the consciousness of the Uncreated Universe, Guaraci is the mother of the living. Jaci is the mother of the vegetables.

We didn’t have speculation. But we had divination. We had Politics which is the science of distribution. And a social-planetary system.

The migrations. The escape from tedious states. Against urban scoliosis. Against the Conservatories and tedious speculation.

From William James and Voronoff. The transfiguration of Taboo into totem. Cannibalism.

The patriarch and the birth of the Moral of the Stork: real ignorance of things + lack of imagination + feelings of authority over the curious proles.

A break from a profound atheism is needed to arrive at the idea of God. But the Caraiba don’t need this. Because they’ve had Guaraci.

The objective born reacting like the Angels of the Fall. After Moses wandered. What have we with this?

Before the Portuguese discovered Brazil, Brazil had discovered happiness.

Against the Indian torchbearer. The Indian son of Maria, godson of Catherine de Medici and son-in-law of Don Antonio de Mariz.

Happiness is the proof of nine*.

In the matriarchy of Pindorama*.

Against Memory as source of custom. The renovated personal experience.

We are concretists. The ideas take count, react, inflame the people in public squares. We suppress the ideas and other paralyses. By the routes. To believe in signals, in the instruments, and in the stars.

Against Goethe, Cornelia, and the court of King John VI*.

Happiness is the proof of nine.

The battle between what may be called Uncreated and the Creature – illustrated by the permanent contradiction of Man and his Taboo. The quotidian love and the capitalist way of life. Cannibalism. Absorption of the sacred enemy. To transform him into totem. The human adventure. The final terrain. However, only the pure elites will come to realize the carnal cannibalism, which brings with it the highest sense in life and evades all the evils identified by Freud, the evil catechisms. What he gives is not a sublimation of sexual instinct. It is the thermal scale of the cannibalistic instinct. From carnality it becomes elective and brings affection. Love, effective. Science, speculative. It deviates and and transfers itself. We arrive at the debasement. The lowly cannibalism agglomerated in the sins of catechism – envy, usury, slander, murder. The plague of so-called cultured and christianized peoples, it is against her we are agitating. Cannibals.

Against Anchieta* canting about the eleven thousand virgins of heaven, in the land of Iracema, – the patriarch John Ramalho founder of Sao Paulo.

Our independence has not yet been proclaimed. Typical phrase of King John VI: My son, put this crown on your head, before some adventurer does! We are expelling the dynasty. It is necessary to expel the spirit of Braga, the ordinations and the rape of Maria da Fonte*.

Against the social reality, well-dressed oppressor, cataloged by Freud – a reality without complexities, without madness, without prostitutions and without penitentiaries of the matriarchy of Pindorama.

Oswald de Andrade
in Piratinga
374th Anniversary of the Feast of Bishop Sardine*
(From Anthropofagy Review, Year 1 Issue 1, May 1928)

*1.The Tupi were an indigneous tribe of Brazil. Unfamiliar non-Western proper names are deities from the Tupi language.

*2.  Alençar – Portuges writer and composer who wrote stories romanticizing the “noble savage.”

*3. Indigenous chants.

*4. galimatias – Nonsense talk.

*5. prova do nove – simple proof used to teach children mathematics, colloquial English translation would be “proof of the pudding” but I hate that term.

*6. Pindorama – indigenous term for Brazil – “land of palms”

*7. Last Portuguese king to reign over Brazil.

*8. Anchieta – Portuguese colonial missionary, responsible for producing some religious works in indigenous languages.

*9. Leader of an 1848 popular revolt (crushed) in Northern Portugal.

*10. Bishop Sardine was sacrificed and eaten by the Tupi in ritual veneration in 1554.